<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://Opengenome.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=ORF_prediction_program</id>
	<title>ORF prediction program - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://Opengenome.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=ORF_prediction_program"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://Opengenome.net/index.php?title=ORF_prediction_program&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-13T00:32:02Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.31.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://Opengenome.net/index.php?title=ORF_prediction_program&amp;diff=11054&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>210.218.222.82 at 08:27, 17 June 2006</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://Opengenome.net/index.php?title=ORF_prediction_program&amp;diff=11054&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2006-06-17T08:27:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;ORF prediction progrmas are bioinformatics tools for prediction open reading frames.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;There have been numerous computational methods for processing prokaryotic genomic ORFs.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Most of them are ab initio prediction methods.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;They provide the genomic coordinates of candidate ORFs using their own statistical and mathematical algorithms:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;GeneMark &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;ECOPARSE&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;GeneHacker &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;GeneMark.hmm&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;GLIMMER &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;GeneMarkS &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;EasyGene &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;ZCURVE &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;GeneLook &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;However, the ORFs predicted by such programs usually need further time-consuming manual processes. This is mainly due to low accuracy and insufficient evidence. Moreover, their accuracy usually depends on the quality of training sets and/or &amp;amp;lsquo;seed&amp;amp;rsquo; ORFs that need manual validation for better performance. Even though GeneMarkS and GeneLook have increased the prediction accuracy, and GeneLook and the modified EasyGene&amp;amp;nbsp;have automated those manual steps, they still do not provide comprehensive information on predicted ORFs. Information such as frame-shifts, homology-based gene evidence, and best pair-wise matches against other prokaryotes is invaluable for professional curation and large-scale comparative analysis.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;To complement such ab initio prediction methods, some ORF prediction programs add homology-based methods: ORPHEUS, Critica, FrameD (17), and YACOP (18). ORPHEUS uses the DPS (DNA-Protein Search) program (19) to compare a given genomic sequence with a non-redundant protein sequence databank. FrameD can utilize a BLASTX (20) output provided by the user and provides predicted frame-shifts and conserved regions with other proteins. Critica uses the BLASTN program (20) to align a given genomic sequence with its related sequences chosen from DNA databases. YACOP combines three gene-predicting programs, Critica, Glimmer, and ZCURVE.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>210.218.222.82</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>